Michigan's New Cannabis Tax Controversy: What It Means

At the epicenter of a pivotal cannabis policy debate, Michigan is introducing a 24% wholesale tax on marijuana that has already sparked constitutional challenges. This unfolding legal drama is garnering national attention, potentially impacting cannabis taxation frameworks and voter-approved legal structures countrywide.Image 2

Regardless of whether you're a cannabis consumer or geographically removed from Michigan, the results of this case could set precedents for how states architect, modify, and defend cannabis tax legislation. Here’s what you need to know.

Understanding Michigan's Proposal

Within its 2025–2026 budget framework, Michigan's government has instituted a 24% wholesale cannabis tax aimed at funding vital road infrastructure improvements. This levy impacts the product lifecycle earlier, prior to retail availability at dispensaries.

In addition to this, Michigan already maintains two taxes:

  • A 10% excise tax on consumer cannabis transactions, a mandate approved by voters in 2018

  • A ubiquitous 6% state sales tax

If implemented, the new tax structure would position Michigan among the states with the most complex cannabis taxation layers, potentially reshaping industry dynamics and cost implications for stakeholders.Image 3

Why the Industry's Legal Pushback?

The Michigan Cannabis Industry Association (MCIA) vehemently opposes this tax, citing its unconstitutionality. The core of their argument is:

The 2018 voter-backed legislation cannot be altered without a three-fourths supermajority vote.

Given that the Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act (MRTMA) was a direct outcomes of voter approval, it enjoys special protections requiring any modifications to pass with a supermajority in the Legislature. The wholesale tax's passage was achieved with a simple majority, prompting MCIA spokesperson Rose Tantraphol to highlight their advocacy for Michigan voters' rights. (Source: Michigan Advance)

There is also a concern that heightened costs could discourage consumer participation in the legal market, replicating challenges observed in high-tax jurisdictions like California.

Have Questions?
Let's talk. We are here to help!
Contact Us

The State's Position

Michigan defends the new tax as a necessary mechanism to fund road projects, asserting that:

  • The wholesale tax is distinct from amendments to the 2018 law

  • Legislators possess fiscal authority to enact such taxes

  • The tax’s primary objective is buttressing infrastructure, not reshaping cannabis policy

Should the courts validate this stance, the tax implementation is slated for January 1, 2026.Image 1

Implications for Consumers

This debate transcends state lines, as cannabis tax frameworks often influence broader legislative tendencies. If the tax triumphs:

  • Wholesale cannabis costs could surge

  • Retail prices may escalate in response

  • Consumers might gravitate toward lower-cost unregulated channels

  • Smaller businesses may encounter adverse market pressures or consolidation

If overturned, Michigan will maintain its current, competitively lower tax stance.

The Broader National Context

Though born in Michigan, this case's implications resonate nationwide.

1. Testing the Depth of Voter-Protected Laws

If taxes can be passed without supermajority endorsement, the essence of ballot initiatives may fundamentally alter across states.

2. Shaping Other States' Taxation Models

States battling infrastructure deficits may replicate Michigan's strategy if the tax is endorsed.

3. Highlighting Ongoing Cannabis Tax Disparities

Diverse tax schemes presently dominate U.S. discourse, ranging from minimal structures like Oregon's to burdensome models in California fueling illegal trade.

Michigan's legal journey may become a blueprint for future challenges in other regions.

What Lies Ahead?

A Michigan Court of Claims judge has begun deliberations, with a decision expected soon. The verdict will likely progress to the Michigan Supreme Court for finality.

The ruling's ramifications will be pivotal — influencing Michigan’s cannabis market, encapsulating the governance of voter-driven laws, emerging market regulations, and states' fiscal legislations.

Have Questions?
Let's talk. We are here to help!
Contact Us
Share this article...

Sign up for our newsletter.

Each month, we will send you a roundup of our latest blog content covering the tax and accounting tips & insights you need to know.

I confirm this is a service inquiry and not an advertising message or solicitation. By clicking “Submit”, I acknowledge and agree to the creation of an account and to the and .

We care about the protection of your data.

Welcome! We're here to help.
How can I assist you?
Please fill out the form and our team will get back to you shortly The form was sent successfully